Both models also have their control panels put on the front side to allow easy access, but you may have noticed that Fender Acoustasonic 90 comes with more onboard controls than Fishman Loudbox Mini. } So Fishman Loudbox Mini, while being a pricier option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $100 Fender Acoustasonic 15, as seen on the chart below. Previously owned an SWR California Blonde. }table#t132 tbody tr td#n3 { - Fender’s smart feedback elimination circuit will tame shrill tones and unwanted squeal (feedback). Quite interestingly, Fishman Loudbox Mini comes with a dark brown housing, whereas Fender Acoustasonic 90 features a light brown housing. border-width: 0px; Popular … line-height: 1.2; Registered User : Join Date: Mar 2010. Ad. table#t132 tbody tr td#n1 { border-width: 0px; no. background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#660000), color-stop(100%,#8F0000)); Compare. yes. 3: Graphical EQ (slider) N/A. width: 40%; Fishman Loudbox Mini Vs Fender Acoustasonic. yes. margin: 20px 0; However, it's fairly safe to say that Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge is a more popular guitar amp, based on its 100+ reviews. - Drivers: 6.5" woofer, 1" tweeter filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr="#660000", endColorstr="#8F0000",GradientType=0 ); border-collapse: collapse; Prev Page 7 of 7 Next Prev Page 7 of 7 Next . table#t132 tfoot tr { background: #660000; padding: 4px; So Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Fender Acoustic 100, as seen on the chart below. Each of the two models packs considerable power. Now, about the performance. Easiest to use: Fishman Loudbox Mini. Best for effects: Fender Acoustic 200. Having two separate drivers for handling bass and treble independently, the amp is capable of projecting lows, mids, and highs more fully and more accurately. It is very compact and portable, measuring just 12” x 13.7” x 9.7” and weighing by only 19.7 lbs. } } It's fairly safe to say that Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge is a more popular guitar amp, Customers who view Fender Acoustic 100 and Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge often consider, Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge, the pricier option, tends to get, Reviews from real customers who bought the product on Amazon, ranks #8 and Fender Acoustic 100 ranks #38, Find the best guitar amp in Guitar Amp Finder, 100 W Amplifier specifically designed for acoustic guitar and vocals, Bluetooth connectivity to stream audio from your phone, 8" full-range speaker with "whizzer" cone for enhanced clarity, Onboard professional sounding digital effects, Features: rechargeable battery power Bluetooth connectivity instrument and mic channels with input gain controls 1/8” auxiliary input balanced XLR D.I. Fishman Loudbox Mini Marshall AS50D; Brand: Fishman: Marshall Amps: Key features - Power: 60W with Master Volume - Drivers: 6.5" woofer, 1" tweeter - Weight: 19.7 lbs. line-height: 2.0; I have a Fishman Loudbox Mini that continues to blow my mind how good it sounds. The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification: Fishman LoudBox Mini vs. Fender Acoustasonic 30 DSP User Name: Remember Me? It's in the top 3 bestselling guitar amps and has a couple of popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Boss Acs-live or Roland AC-60 . (See also : Fishman Loudbox Mini Vs Marshall AS50D). - Weight: 19.7 lbs. The data presented is for information purposes only. border-style: outset; } This website displays data from third party public sources. 4 out of 5. text-align: center;border-left: 1px solid #CCCCCC; - Power: 60W with Master Volume Fishman Loudbox Mini and Fender Acoustasonic are two guitar amps available in a similar price range. Musicalvs.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Musicalvs.com (amazon.com, amazonsupply.com, or myhabit.com). However, if your budget is limited and you need more power, you can choose Fender Acoustasonic 90 instead. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product. } Performance So Fender Acoustasonic 40 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge, as seen on the chart below. Fishman Loudbox Mini Vs Fender Acoustasonic vertical-align: top;width: 100%;border-top: 1px solid #CCCCCC;border-right: 1px solid #CCCCCC;box-shadow: 0 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4); Decision Fishman Loudbox Mini Vs Marshall AS50D. text-align: center;border-bottom: 1px solid #CCCCCC;border-left: 1px solid #CCCCCC; However, Fishman Loudbox Mini is actually more tonally and acoustically accurate. background: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); Afterward, we will determine which guitar amp that makes the best bang out of the bucks. Fender Acoustic 100. Fishman Loudbox Mini Charge is $299.96 more expensive than an average guitar amp ($199.99). background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); border-top: medium none; table#t132 tbody tr { It can easily deliver louder volume levels without breaking the audio reproduction. My was a pre-Fender version and got is used for between $400-$450. We can't guarantee correctness and completeness of all the data presented here, and therefore will not accept liability for any issues arising from usage of this data.